What is meant by a "joint trial"?

A "joint trial" refers to a scenario where multiple claims or cases that share common issues or facts are tried together in a single proceeding. This approach is beneficial as it promotes judicial efficiency, reduces the risk of inconsistent judgments, and allows for a more comprehensive resolution of related disputes. By hearing these cases together, the court can streamline the process, conserve resources, and provide clarity to all parties involved.

The concept of a joint trial is particularly useful when the cases involve overlapping evidence or legal questions, making it more practical to address them in a unified manner rather than fragmented through separate trials. This method also helps to minimize the burden on witnesses, who might otherwise have to testify multiple times in different trials concerning the same set of facts.

In contrast, the other options describe scenarios that do not capture the essence of a joint trial. For instance, one judge overseeing multiple cases does not inherently mean those cases are related or being tried together. Similarly, a trial involving witnesses from different states or one that is held in multiple jurisdictions does not indicate a joint trial unless the cases themselves are related and being consolidated for that purpose.