Which of the following actions does NOT lead to long-arm jurisdiction under CPLR 302?

Long-arm jurisdiction is a legal concept that allows a court to exercise jurisdiction over an out-of-state defendant based on certain activities or connections to the state of New York. Under CPLR 302, there are specific actions that can establish this jurisdiction.

Owning property outside New York does not lead to long-arm jurisdiction because it reflects a lack of sufficient contacts with the state. The key principle is that long-arm jurisdiction hinges on the defendant's activities that can be directly linked to New York, allowing the state to assert legal authority. For instance, transacting business or committing tortious acts within New York creates a direct link between the defendant and the state, justifying the court's jurisdiction.

Moreover, committing a tortious act outside New York that causes injury in New York can also lead to long-arm jurisdiction under specific circumstances, as there is a clear causal connection between the defendant's actions and the impact felt within the state. This principle recognizes the importance of protecting individuals in New York from harm that arises from conduct occurring beyond its borders.

In contrast, simply owning property outside of New York lacks the necessary connection that CPLR 302 requires to establish long-arm jurisdiction, making it the correct choice in this context.